Skip to main content

2022 statistics of Pinto Ventures:

  • we received 300 qualified leads; 
  • spoke with 65 teams;
  • took forward conversations with 15 of them;
  • took a closer look and did DD in 5 (less than 2%);
  • and did only one new investment (to be disclosed soon).

Why did we do all this work? 

Selecting startups to invest is just 1/5 of our time. The rest is spent supporting teams throughout the ups and downs of building new profitable growing tech businesses, which is a very different approach from other early stage investors.

How do others work?

A typical early stage fund needs to create results after 10+ years for their investors or LPs. Investments are done in the first 1 to 3 years across ca. 20 to 30 companies. Portfolio construction is about maximising the chances of having at least one winner in each fund. The rule of thumb is that the “winner” investment will need to yield at least 1.5 times the size of the fund. Assuming an investment in equity of 20% and dilution until exit to 10%, this implies that even a small 50 million fund would need to have at least one investment worth 750 million at exit. This is the reason why the "VC industry" speaks about unicorns. It has little to do with founders. It has to do with the mathematics of being a VC. What this means, is that the job of the most VC partners is investing and less building.  

The Pinto Ventures way

Our portfolio construction is different. We make a diversification across the life cycle of the startups we invest in: from angel, seed, A, B, C, D and beyond. That means being a long term investor, working on continuing “graduating” the companies we invest in, and adding one or two new teams, every year. 
This is gives us a unique position compared with other early stage VCs and Angel Investors and makes us much more aligned with founders than any other investor. We believe Small VCs as Pinto Ventures with clear focus and long term investing strategies can deliver the best results in Early Stage Tech investing. 

Our goals for 2023

2023 will mark the first 10 years of our investment activities. We have invested in teams in Europe from Tallinn to Turin from Barcelona to Berlin. Yes, along the way we paid our "learning money" and lost a few investment. But we did have a good share of great results. Our main goal, besides keeping a strong TVPI (16x currently), is to start managing for a strong DPI at the levels of the best quartile of VCs. 
Because we are funded with permanent capital, it means being able to achieve this not only by exits, but also dividends and share price growth of the companies we supported, keeping our long term investors profile and close alignment with founders.
The focus of our work in 2023 will be with newer Pinto ventures family members getting them to reach good market traction and attractive unit economics; for the teams in Series B it is to reach breakeven; and reaching self-funding of growth for C and beyond companies. Maximising funding is for us not a goal. If a company can go all the way with only a few rounds of funding, great!

Our philosophy

We truly believe in an "investing" mindset and oppose a "trader" mindset. Value does not come from funding round multiples and markup of values based on private capital rounds (the "trader" mentality). The ultimate test of "entrepreneurial" success is simply growth and dividends. This something I learned from Mr Michael Kuehne and Kuehne + Nagel. 
It is a long journey to get there but the one that we feel is right and that we want to be part of.

We look forward to working with our teams & friends in 2023!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Building the Future

Marc Andreessen of a16z, the Silicon Valley VC has recently published a fantastic post entitled " It's time to build ". He looks at how society has failed to see the Covid-19 crisis coming and how we as society are dealing with it. He claims "part of the problem is clearly foresight, a failure of imagination. But the other part of the problem is what we didn’t *do* in advance. [...] Our nation and our civilisation were built on production, on building. [...] There is only one way to honour their [our forefathers] legacy and to create the future we want for our own children and grandchildren, and that’s to build". Marc calls society to focus on building and less on rent-seeking of the accomplishments of our forefathers. The future is not built by societal-osmosis. The future of our societies is the sum of present actions taken by individuals and their teams over time. The success in building the future is the sum of the actions of special individuals. Thos...

My most important lesson from Professor Clayton Christensen

This post first appeared in Medium, January 25, 2020 To those that dangle between the corporate and the startup world, the works of Professor Christensen are a  must read . They are useful both for startup teams in a mission to disrupt incumbents and for Boards and Executive Teams of incumbents considering how to react to innovators. I have used his models with many of the companies I worked with. For example when showing how innovators can disrupt the billion dollar industry of freight forwarders and how big incumbent freight forwarders should plan their moves to „disrupt the disrupter“. Add caption But the biggest lesson of Professor Christensen to me was actually a very different one In June 2010 he announced that he had been diagnosed with follicular lymphoma. In July 2010, he had an ischemic stroke. This is enough for any human being to consider getting his „affairs in order“ and leave the stage to dedicate his time to the ones he loves. But on a sunny and cold October 2010 da...